Tuesday, June 7, 2016

New York Times: Hillary Lies Circa 1996 (Video)

SURPRISE! Hillary Clinton and the truth make for strange bedfellows!

For anyone focused in the slightest bit on politics the content of the article below written by William Safire in the New York Times back in 1996 will come as little surprise!

Hillary Clinton has a long history of being strangers with the truth along with an affinity for obfuscation of the facts. As we head into the real campaign leading into the general election, this fact can never be repeated often enough! Some examples...

  • The Benghazi video
  • Email scandal
  • Clinton Foundation
  • Circa 1990 taking Bosnian sniper fire
  • Leaving the Bill Clinton presidency 'dead broke'
  • She was the product of all immigrant grandparents
Of course her 'soulmate' and longtime political partner has had some of the same issues with, shall we say, factual speak, most famously uttering the phrase 'it depends on what the meaning of the word is, is'! 

So while the other two 2016 candidates for President of the United States are most certainly deeply flawed, the seemingly pathological nature of Hillary Clinton's aversion to the truth is troubling to say the least and should be a disqualifying factor.

Unfortunately for the nation Obamabots who are soon to be Hillary sycophants, along with the basic Democrat and far-left ideologue, will vote for her no matter what including if she happens to be indicted.

But for those who are on the fence there will hopefully be a viable, patriotic and capitalistic American candidate to choose from as an alternative!

Essay;Blizzard of Lies

Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar.

Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.

1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker.

She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe.

2. The abuse of Presidential power known as Travelgate elicited another series of lies. She induced a White House lawyer to assert flatly to investigators that Mrs. Clinton did not order the firing of White House travel aides, who were then harassed by the F.B.I. and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton's cronies.

Now we know, from a memo long concealed from investigators, that there would be "hell to pay" if the furious First Lady's desires were scorned. The career of the lawyer who transmitted Hillary's lie to authorities is now in jeopardy. Again, she lied with good reason: to avoid being identified as a vindictive political power player who used the F.B.I. to ruin the lives of people standing in the way of juicy patronage.

3. In the aftermath of the apparent suicide of her former partner and closest confidant, White House Deputy Counsel Vincent Foster, she ordered the overturn of an agreement to allow the Justice Department to examine the files in the dead man's office. Her closest friends and aides, under oath, have been blatantly disremembering this likely obstruction of justice, and may have to pay for supporting Hillary's lie with jail terms.

Again, the lying was not irrational. Investigators believe that damning records from the Rose Law Firm, wrongfully kept in Vincent Foster's White House office, were spirited out in the dead of night and hidden from the law for two years -- in Hillary's closet, in Web Hubbell's basement before his felony conviction, in the President's secretary's personal files -- before some were forced out last week.

Why the White House concealment? For good reason: The records show Hillary Clinton was lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S.& L., and indicate she may have conspired with Web Hubbell's father-in-law to make a sham land deal that cost taxpayers $3 million.

Why the belated release of some of the incriminating evidence? Not because it mysteriously turned up in offices previously searched. Certainly not because Hillary Clinton and her new hang-tough White House counsel want to respond fully to lawful subpoenas.

One reason for the Friday-night dribble of evidence from the White House is the discovery by the F.B.I. of copies of some of those records elsewhere. When Clinton witnesses are asked about specific items in "lost" records -- which investigators have -- the White House "finds" its copy and releases it. By concealing the Madison billing records two days beyond the statute of limitations, Hillary evaded a civil suit by bamboozled bank regulators.

Another reason for recent revelations is the imminent turning of former aides and partners of Hillary against her; they were willing to cover her lying when it advanced their careers, but are inclined to listen to their own lawyers when faced with perjury indictments.

Therefore, ask not "Why didn't she just come clean at the beginning?" She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.

No wonder the President is fearful of holding a prime-time press conference. Having been separately deposed by the independent counsel at least twice, the President and First Lady would be well advised to retain separate defense counsel.

H/T Intellectual Froglegs


get a free wedge or hybrid 

No comments :

Post a Comment