On Giving Tuesday your $22 donation to Heroes To Heroes Foundation can go a long way towards helping military veterans suffering with PTSD, Moral Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury begin to finally heal!
Whether it's the Fed maintaining 0% interest rates or just another speculative bubble that developed out of thin air, real estate in some cities around the US have surpassed pre-financial crisis highs!
In which cities do people between 19-39 have to have a roommate because they have no other financial alternative?
Read the story and check out the charts at LI here.
Unfortunately, in 2015, those Americans who have faithfully and dutifully followed THIS leader seem to have apparently and finally learned the truth about Barack Obama!
That truth is that he is no leader, unless of course you consider leading the United States down the wrong path in each and every decision that he has made leadership!
Democrats and far-left liberal lemmings who would vote D no matter who was on the ballot are now learning the hard way that elections have consequences but unfortunately, by extension, they have dragged the rest of us down with them.
When I hear liberal pundits on television talk shows admitting to the failures of this President I say that is all well and good but it is too damn late!
By putting party and power over country and national security they and their ilk have allowed irreparable damage to be done to the United States and the world.
And now, this morning, we wake up to Turkey shooting down a Russian fighter.
Where do we go from here?
From March 2011...
'Note to Obama: If you want to be treated like a superpower then act like a superpower!' In a scene out of Bizarro World the United States is pissed at the French for being too aggressive in Libya!
Is this what the United States has become under the Obama administration? Upset because the French have become too aggressive by taking the lead in the attack and implementation of a no-fly zone over Libya? The French???
Obama ceded mission control in Libya to the U.N., Arab League and NATO while bypassing the Congress. He has since relabeled the mission goals from humanitarian to the taking out of Gaddafi and back several times. It is simply another glaring representation of an Obama attempt to be all things to all people.
As further indication of his global lack of standing, once the mission commenced his "coalition" that included the Arab League, NATO member Turkey and abstaining Security Council member Russia all hung him out to dry.
As I heard one commentator say he handled the crisis as a community organizer would, but certainly not as the commander-in-chief of the United States should.
All of this was being accomplished while President Obama was kicking a soccer ball around in Brazil on a junket that never should have been taken?
Note to Obama: If you want the U.S. to be considered the global superpower, do us a favor and lead like the commander-in-chief of the global superpower. But I suppose the obvious point is that he does not want us in that position.
Lead and stop being led so that we won't ever have to take a back seat to France again!
From the Financial Times: "French attempts to sidestep Nato at the outset of military operations against Libya have divided the international coalition enforcing a no-fly zone over the country, western diplomats said.
The French moves, which western diplomats said included launching the first attack on Libya without fully informing its allies, angered US and UK officials and are hampering efforts to transfer command of the operation to Nato, officials said. Relations grew so tense on Monday that French and German ambassadors to Nato walked out of a meeting of the North Atlantic Council, the alliance’s decision-making body, after Anders Fogh Rasmussen, secretary-general, criticised Paris for impeding Nato involvement and Germany for not actively participating."
Terrorism, violent extremism and the way in which the worlds religions coexist with each other!
In the final analysis, is the list below that I received from a reader some time ago but never published politically incorrect or simply correct?
List of some of the terrorist actions we have seen over the past two decades:
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims'
NOW, Let's look at how the different religions can live as neighbors:
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confucians living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confucians living with Hindus = No Problem
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM
SO THIS LEADS TO THE FACT THAT MUSLIMS
Are not happy in Gaza
Are not happy in Egypt
Are not happy in Libya
Are not happy in Morocco
Are not happy in Iran
Are not happy in Iraq
Are not happy in Yemen
Are not happy in Afghanistan
Are not happy in Pakistan
Are not happy in Syria
Are not happy in Lebanon
Are not happy in Nigeria
Are not happy in Kenya
Are not happy in Sudan
So, where exactly are Muslims happy?
They're happy in Australia
They're happy in England
They're happy in Belgium
They're happy in France
They're happy in Italy
They're happy in Germany
They're happy in Sweden
They're happy in Norway
They're happy in India
They're happy in the USA
They're happy in Canada
Bottom line: They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!
And who do they blame? Not Islam... Not their leadership... Not themselves...
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!!
And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were not happy.
They don't have any multi-countries treaty; they don't have any commercial agreement with anyone; they don't have any International link but they have:
Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
ISIS: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
STOP trying to look politically correct and pretending that Islam is not the source of terrorism; Islam and its fanatics ARE the burden and the enemy of the Civilized World.
Personality disorders that might explain the way he has performed, or not performed, as President of the United States!
I was driven to write this by the current debate over whether or not to bring or delay bringing Syrian refugees we cannot sufficiently vet to our shores but, by now, we all unfortunately know the drill concerning Barack Obama. A drill that can be described by the partial list below.
We know all know these things unfortunately through the way in which Barack Obama has performed both domestically and as our foreign policy and national security leader during his 7-years in office.
A dismal performance of his one actual job as POTUS, the protection of the United States and its citizens, that has been wontonly neglected for reasons only he knows.
Observations of Barack Obama:
Refusal to ever change course or admit that a policy or 'strategy' may not be working. In other words an inability to ever concede or acknowledge either to the public or himself obvious mistakes,
Lack of any apparent ability to express emotion over some of the most heinous acts of violence and murder that have been committed against innocents,
An almost adolescent approach to even the most serious situations that seem to compel him to point fingers rather than to emote empathy,
What appears to be a compulsion to obsess over issues that may or may not be a priority at the time, in the countries best interests or within his job description,
An approach to issues and conflicts that seems, at least to this amateur psychologist, to indicate an inferiority complex that forces him to attack rather than to ever discuss and compromise,
There are no doubt more I am forgetting so please feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments below.
From a 2013 article at The Common Sense Show by Dave Hodges, I found an excellent analysis of what some of our President's psychological issues might be...
'...History has shown that most of the brutal dictators of the past have shared three mental illnesses, namely, Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), Paranoid Personality Disorder (PPD) and Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).
Before analyzing President Obama according to these criteria, based upon observed public behaviors, please allow me to make a few general observations with regard to these three conditions. NPD sufferers believe that they are entitled to special privilege and that the rules of society apply to others but not to them. PPD individuals are people who are unusually suspicious in situations in which most people would not be concerned. They frequently change allies and lack stable relationships in their lives. Finally, ASPD people are a combination of what we used to call a sociopath and a psychopath. These people are capable to doing great harm to another human being without feeling any empathy and remorse.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
In order for a person to be diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) they must meet five or more of the following symptoms:
Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power,brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
Believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
Requires excessive admiration
Has a very strong sense of entitlement, e.g., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
Is exploitative of others, e.g., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
Lacks empathy, e.g., is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
Regularly shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
Five out eight of these symptoms are sufficient cause to warrant a positive diagnosis. Obama is one of the most self-righteous people on the planet and we have numerous quotes which exemplify this point.
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America”. Very few Americans had any idea what Obama meant by that quote. Five years into his presidency, it is clear that Obama meant to turn this country into an impoverished nation devoid of civil liberties. This is the ultimate expression of the communist legacy that he is trying to build.
This president does not tolerate normal criticism which comes with the territory of being a president. He has consistently sponsored legislation which inhibits the constitutionally guaranteed rights of legitimate protest with his support of the NDAA. This is the ultimate in haughtiness.
Obama exhibits extreme signs of feeling a sense of entitlement. His incessant misuse of the power of executive orders provides prima fascia evidence that “his will be done” and that he is above the law with regard to violating the constitutional rights of the American people.
Obama is an extremely exploitative person. However, in the grand scheme of politics, it is a needed survival skill to take advantage of people in one’s climb to the top of the political world. Therefore, is Obama exploitative by nature, or, do the political realities of his position dictate the emergence of this trait as a survival skill? The jury is out on this one.
“You did not build that business”. Remember that insulting and impersonal slap in the face of every small business owner in America? This statement is reflective of Obama’s view that nobody is bigger than “my” government.
The President’s recent statement in which he bragged he was really good at killing people by using drones speaks to his extreme level of insensitivity.
Of the eight traits associated with this disorder, I see seven of the eight with the eighth trait not being supported due to a lack of evidence.
President Obama clearly suffers from NPD. People with NPD can indeed function to some degree in society. However, they often make very ineffective leaders because they almost always put their needs ahead of the needs of the people they purport to serve.
Paranoid Personality Disorder
To make a positive diagnosis for this disorder, I would have to possess intimate details about the life of Obama. Unfortunately, that information is not readily available. Here are the traits of PPD.
Suspects, without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting, harming, or deceiving him or her
Is preoccupied with unjustified doubts about the loyalty or trustworthiness of friends or associates
Is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear that the information will be used maliciously against him or her
Reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign remarks or events
Persistently bears grudges (i.e., is unforgiving of insults, injuries, or slights)
Perceives attacks on his or her character or reputation that are not apparent to others, and is quick to react angrily or to counterattack
Has recurrent suspicions, without justification, regarding fidelity of spouse or sexual partner
Certainly Obama’s known childhood experiences, especially with that of living with Frank Marshall Davis, undoubted scarred him and left him with feelings of extreme abandonment. This factor, alone, could prove to be the breeding ground for PPD.
As I have previously covered, I know that most of his first degree relatives were involved in MK Ultra. Certainly the breeding ground for PPD is in place given his unstable background.
Since we lack highly detailed information about his personal life, it is difficult to affirmatively diagnose Obama with this disorder, except for one thing. Since becoming president, Obama has fired nearly 200 command level officers from the military. In contrast, President Bush fired two. This would be the expected actions of a highly paranoid individual in that he would dismantle the command structure of military in such a significant manner. Although I cannot point to the fact that Obama has a requisite number of traits which determines that he is suffering from PPD, I think it is highly likely.
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Of all the mental illnesses we could examine with regard to a leader’s propensity to commit extreme violence against his people, this would be the most concerning of all the mental illnesses. This disorder also happens to be where Obama has exhibited extreme pathological behavior with regard to this affliction. The traits of ASPD are as follows:
Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
Reckless disregard for safety of self or others
Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt an individual. They may display a glib, superficial charm and can be quite voluble and verbally facile (e.g., using technical terms or jargon that might impress someone who is unfamiliar with the topic). Lack of empathy, inflated self-appraisal, and superficial charm are features that have been commonly included in traditional conceptions of psychopathy and may be particularly distinguishing of Antisocial Personality Disorder in prison or forensic settings where criminal, delinquent, or aggressive acts are likely to be nonspecific. These individuals may also be irresponsible and exploitative in their sexual relationships.
Obama has extreme superficial charm. After all, he twice fooled a nation of sheep with his manufactured demeanor. Obama is highly impulsive. His assistants do not know if he will attend an intelligence briefing or will he be on the golf course.
President Obama has never held a real job. He has served as a community agitator (err community activist), a state senator, a less than a one-term US Senator and then of course, a President. Where is his employment history? The bottom line is that this President has never held a regular job.
The President has engaged in repeated acts of lying and breaking the law as witnessed by the events at Benghazi, the NSA spy scandal, the IRS harassment scandal, Obama’s spying on AP reporters, Fast and Furious gun running to the Mexican drug cartels, etc. This administration has been little more than one great big criminal enterprise.
The sum total of Obama’s actions demonstrate a willful disregard for the welfare of others. ASPD individuals frequently use aliases. Do you think that “Barry”, the student, attending Occidental College would ever do such a thing?
Of the seven traits listed above, one would have to claim the presence of four of the seven traits in order to justify a diagnosis of ASPD. I see six of seven traits being exhibited by President Obama. His superficial charm, his lack of remorse for his heinous acts and his inability to learn from his mistakes, unquestionably cast him in the role of being an ASPD individual...'
To Democrats In Congress And Barack Obama: The job of the federal government is to protect the citizens of the United States! For those Americans, including (or especially) those Democrat in Congress who are dutifully following along with Barack Obama like the lemmings that they are, here is a reminder of just who are enemy is and why national security in the case of the Syrian refugees trumps everything else! The President and Democrats will position the issue as that anyone who opposes the immediate entry of un-vetted refugees is a racist, Islamophobic or as someone who forgets that their ancestors were likely refugees at some point. I for one DO NOT forget where I came from! The fact is, however, that few are saying not to accept refugees but merely that we have to vet them. In the context of national security, doesn't that make sense? And further, one may wonder why it is that for Barack Obama national security always seems to take a backseat to politics (or something else)? And at the bottom of the list below please add the recent attack in Paris, the attack in Paris that killed Jews on a Friday in a Kosher shop and likely today's attack on a western hotel in Mali! From February 2015... 'Muslim History Lesson: WE, THE STUPID' This article serves as a wake-up call for Americans who are still not exactly sure who the enemy is in our war against Islamic extremism! Of course the sad reality is that one of the only Americans left who still can't or for some reason won't identify the enemy in the global war on terrorism, is our Commander-in-Chief, Barack Obama.
In the case of our President, privy to information and analysis that we 'folks' are not and yet who can't seem to see the forest for the trees, the larger question then is why?
So for those who can't see that the enemy we face in the war against Islamic extremism are in fact Islamic extremists, as a group you will be know from here on out as We, The Stupid! WE, THE STUPID (sent by a TPC subscriber)
The war started in the 7th century and lasted through the 17th. I would contend it never stopped but historically the facts below are correct. This is why I choke when I hear someone say we will defeat or contain these Islamic terrorists in a few years or even 30 years as recently stated by Leon Panetta. If the latest batch of murders, beheadings, and killing of innocent Christians has shocked you, maybe you should read this compilation of historical facts about the hatred of Muslims. WE, THE STUPID This is all factually (and historically) correct - and verifiable: In 732 AD the Muslim Army which was moving on Paris was defeated and turned back at Tours, France, by Charles Martell. In 1571 AD the Muslim Army/ Navy was defeated by the Italians and Austrians as they tried to cross the Mediterranean to attack southern Europe in the Battle of Lapanto. In 1683 AD the Turkish Muslim Army, attacking Eastern Europe, was finally defeated in the Battle of Vienna by German and Polish Christian Armies. ...this crap has been going on for 1,400 years and half of the politicians don't even know it. If these battles had not been won we might be speaking Arabic and Christianity could be non-existent; Judaism certainly would be... And let us not forget that Hitler was an admirer of Islam and that the Mufti of Jerusalem was Hitler's guest in Berlin and raised Bosnian Muslim SS Divisions: the 13th and 21st Waffen SS Divisions who killed Jews, Russians, Gypsies, and any other "subhumans". Reflecting: A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality that they imagine that America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves. Pause a moment, reflect back. These events are actual events from history. They really happened! Do you remember? 1. In 1968, Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by a Muslim male. 2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by Muslim males. 3. In 1972 a Pan Am 747 was hijacked and eventually diverted to Cairo where a fuse was lit on final approach. It was blown up shortly after landing by Muslim males. 4. In 1973 a Pan Am 707 was destroyed in Rome, with 33 people killed, when it was attacked with grenades by Muslim males. 5. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim males. 6. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim males. 7. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by Muslim males. 8. In 1985, the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by Muslim males. 9. In 1985, TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by Muslim males. 10. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by Muslim males. 11. In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by Muslim males. 12. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim males. 13. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take down the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by Muslim males. 14. In 2002, the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against Muslim males. 15. In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and beheaded by---you guessed it was a Muslim male. (Plus two other American journalists were just beheaded) 16. In 2013, Boston Marathon Bombing 4 Innocent people including a child killed, 264 injured by Muslim males. No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people. So, ask yourself "Just how stupid are we?" Absolutely No Profiling! They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old, Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss. But leave Muslim males alone, lest they be guilty of profiling. Ask yourself "Just how stupid are we?" Have the American people completely lost their minds or just their power of reason?
As the writer of the award winning story 'Forrest Gump' so aptly put it, 'Stupid Is As Stupid Does'.
Update October 18, 2015: Add the Iran nuclear deal, the debacle in Syria, the attack in Paris and the migrant issue to the drip, drip, drip of the steady 'incompetence' exhibited by the Obama administration. Is anyone really sure that it is actually 'incompetence' and not something more sinister? The article below was originally published on September 1, 2014 but seems to be so accurate that it was important to republish! Incompetence Fatigue, Radical Islam and the American People! There is a disease infecting the American people that could, sometime in the near future, rival Ebola with its potential to be deadly for those who come into contact with it. (A must-read article from Examiner.com titled 'EX-CIA employee admits President Obama is a radical Islamic enemy of America' is presented below)
The disease I speak of is Incompetence Fatigue and I am afraid that it is infecting every corner of our great nation!
This is an idea of how it works:
While Americans fight the good fight every day is there something insidious going on within the Obama administration?
A move towards radical Islam and away from traditional American values!
A move that has been accomplished under the guise of administration incompetence, a 'new' foreign policy and a 'Yes We Can' mantra that says little but that may mean a whole lot?
A move done gradually and persistently and that will one day in the near future will find us waking up to wonder 'How the hell did this happen?'
For the 'regular folks' it will be a type of Hitler-esque experience where evil will have been allowed to rise and spread until it's finally noticed and by then it is to far along to stop.
When examining the current reign of Barack Obama, the moves he has made, those he has neglected to make, decisions made and decisions ignored, we have documented them here in the past.
But it dawned on me just last night (I suppose I may be a little slow on the uptake) that what we may have been watching for six years is a plan so sinister and so perfectly executed at the same time, that it is almost to be admired on the one hand and deathly feared on the other.
A plan implemented by an administration hellbent on its own definition of transformation that, along with a complicit media, has in effect lulled the American people into what I like to call Incompetence Fatigue.
In this psychological phenomenon, each ensuing administration scandal, failure to act or worse act in a way detrimental to the national security interests of the United States resonates less and less because it has been embedded in the minds of Americans that it is par for the course and to be expected.
Working in the administrations favor of course is that while all of this is going on people are more interested in the goings on of the Kardashians and of other worthless stories and people to be paying much attention to Washington anyway.
And at the same time the mainstream media will typically fail to cover these stories and, those news outlets that do, are branded merely as right-wing conspiracy theorists.
Now think about the long list of scandals faced by this administration over the past six years. It's a list that's longer than my arm.
Each has simply faded away as a new one has risen to take its place.
Now we have the ultimate in administration malpractice which is the rise of ISIS coupled with no plan to stop it despite the fact that it has been a known quantity for a very long time.
Big story in the media? Not really!
Huge public outcry demanding to know how a Commander-in-Chief could be so incompetent? Not at all and in fact if you polled 100 average Americans most likely 90 would have no idea of what ISIS is or what it represents!
Is there a demand to know what will be done immediately to combat a cancer that is slowly infiltrating societies all over the world? Absolutely not as the focus is more on this President's golf and fundraising which have overshadowed the real story which is compromised national security.
Today the President is jetting off to speak at Laborfest in Milwaukee when he should be in the White House doing the people's business yet few will notice and even less will care that he's not.
When will they notice? When God-forbid a terror attack hits the United States people will wonder how it could possibly happen and even then they will not point the finger at Barack Obama for sitting idly allowing the proverbial fuse to be lit.
Wake-up America! Wake-up before you wake-up and the nightmare is actually reality!
It’s an explosive charge, one that practically accuses the president of treason.
Today, a former CIA agent bluntly told thenewspaper, World Net Daily, that America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.
Clare M. Lopez is the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute. Since 2013, she has served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. Also Vice President of the Intelligence Summit, she formerly was a career operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, a professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee from 2005-2006, and has served as a consultant, intelligence analyst, and researcher for a variety of defense firms. She was named a Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute in 2011.
Lopez said the global war on terror had been an effort to “stay free of Shariah,” or repressive Islamic law, until the Obama administration began siding with such jihadist groups as the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates. Lopez believes that the Muslim Brotherhood has thoroughly infiltrated the Obama administration and other branches of the federal government. One of the most outrageous of those appointments is Mohamed Elibiary, a senior member of the Department of Homeland Security Advisory Council. According to a report by the Center for Security Policy, Elibiary supports brokering a U.S. partnership with the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group. Two months ago, a firestorm erupted online after Elibiary tweeted that a “Caliphate” is inevitable and compared it to the European Union.
Ms. Lopez also believes Obama had essentially the same goals in the Mideast as the late Osama bin Laden: “to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands.” The former CIA operative’s perspective affects her prescription for what the U.S. should do about the terror army ISIS, as she called for caution and restraint.
While there has been a sudden chorus of politicians and military experts calling for the immediate elimination of the terrorist army after it beheaded American journalist James Foley last week, Lopez believes the U.S. should have an overall strategy in place before fully re-engaging in the Mideast militarily.Any military action would be further complicated, she told WND, if it were not clear which side the U.S. is on, either in the short term or in the overall war on terror.
Lopez felt it was impossible to understand why the president and some of his top appointees, such as CIA Director John Brennan, who is believed to be a Muslim convert, “consistently seem to apologize for Islam, even in the face of such atrocities as the Foley beheading,” adding, they “take pains to assure the world they don’t think IS, (or the Islamic State, also called ISIS) or whichever perpetrator it was, has anything to do with Islam. How can they possibly believe that genuinely when everything these jihadis do tracks directly to the literal text of Quran, hadiths and Shariah?”
“In any case, and for whatever motivations, there is no doubt this administration switched sides in what used to be called the Global War on Terror,” she said.
I wonder if those who don't want to go 'on the record' will finally speak out.