It's a little bit too soon for a 2016 endorsement you say? The 2014 mid-term elections have yet to even take place you say?
And yet, for The New York Times, it's apparently never too early to hop on the Hillary Clinton for President bandwagon with what may not be a de facto endorsement but is pretty damn close!
Putting it another way, The New York Times is laying some preliminary groundwork to try and help Hillary reclaim her reputation that was decimated by her failure to act in Benghazi and that ultimately led to the deaths of four Americans.
This hit to the Hillary reputation was then compounded by the subsequent cover-up and stonewalling for information when attempts were made to get to the truth!
Let's look first at what Benghazi truth sounds like and then what appears to be a The New York Times whitewash of the truth!
(Note: Regardless of why the attack occurred, these people were abandoned by the Hillary-led State Department and the White House and there is no denying that fact!)
From TPC June 22, 2013:
...LETTER IN THE DUBUQUE TOWN CRIER: FROM CYNTHIA LEE MEYERS (COUSIN OF ONE OF THE MEN KILLED IN BENGHAZI)
Cynthia Lee Meyers (cousin of one man who was killed in Benghazi)
"Here is my story. A week out the Embassy in Tripoli began receiving multiple tips about an Al Qaeda cell in the area planning an attack on 9/11 in response to the killing of Bin Laden. For the next several days, the state dept and WH were asked for a security force and were denied at least six times. Ambassador Stevens and his team were given the all clear that The Consulate in Benghazi was safe and there was no need for a security force other than his 3 personal guards (One being my cousin) and a few Libyans who were not armed.
Then the attack and murders occurred. Immediately the WH claimed it was a protest gone bad over a “you tube” video. Obama made a quick speech in the Rose Garden on Sept.12 before catching a plane to Vegas to campaign. He made a generic statement at the end of his speech after placing the blame on an overheated protest over the video. He said "No act of terror will shake the resolve of America .
Later that day and over the next 2 days, the liberal media began saying Ambassador Stevens and the other 3 men died of smoke inhalation. This was not the case. Out of respect for my cousin, I'm not going to be specific about his murder. However Ambassador Stevens was brutally murdered. His genitals were cut off, he was sodomized and beaten and cut and stabbed and burned. He was drug thru the streets and left for dead. This is eyewitness testimony of a local Dr. Who found the Ambassador in a ditch and tried to save his life. He had no idea who he was.
The other 3 men, including my cousin, met similar fates. And deaths due to smoke inhalation is a 100% fabricated LIE. The next week I drove my aunt and Uncle and 2 others to DC to receive his body. We met with Hillary, Panetta, and Susan Rice. ALL of whom apologized and said it was a protest gone bad over a video and exited the area. Next Obama entered with the same story and didn't apologize and wasn't sympathetic.
My aunt cried to this man (Obama) and all he did was hand her flowers and walk away.
I tried to get his attention, but didn't. I got upset and yelled "liar" to him, he kept walking. Then a secret service agent grabbed my arm and led me to a room where I was held till the proceedings were over. America, I saw firsthand how cold this man is.
What kind of liar he is. Most of you haven't a clue about this tyrant and yet you support him. And act like every word he says is Gospel. These murders and the fast and furious cover-ups make water gate look like a kid who told his bff's secret to the class. We must stop this man, and please pass this story along...
From Yid with Lid comes this interpretation of The New York Times article that once again tries to claim that the 9/11 attack on the US embassy in Benghazi was the result of a YouTube video and not a terrorist attack by al Qaeda!
New York Times' Benghazi Fairy Tale Written For Hillary 2016?
'...On Saturday, the NY Times published a report finding no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had a role in the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi that killed four American heroes, and the attack was fueled in large part by anger at an anti-Muslim video, as the Obama administration first claimed. Both points have already been proven wrong, but that doesn't matter to the Times or to Hillary Clinton who is the major beneficiary of the perpetuation of a Benghazi fantasy...'
Read the article at Yid with Lid here.